← Skill Arena

Slides & PPTX skills

Skills that turn a brief into a finished slide deck, PPTX or HTML.

We gave six slide skills the same three deck briefs, all generated by the same base model. Two skills output editable .pptx (Anthropic pptx, MiniMax pptx-generator) and four output HTML decks (frontend-slides, reveal.js, Slidev, Marp). Every deck was rendered to images and scored blind by two independent judges.

Model: Claude Sonnet 56 competitors3 tasks2 blind judges

Leaderboard

Rank 1
frontend-slides

Happycapy · Design-forward decks, it won the portfolio deck and the arena overall.

8.2
Rank 2
revealjs

ryanbbrown · Design-forward browser decks, it won the pitch and launch tasks.

8.0
Rank 3
pptx

Anthropic · Reliable, editable .pptx across deck types.

7.3
4
pptx-generator

MiniMax · Editable PowerPoint with charts and a market-size visual.

7.2
5
slidev

antfu · Developer talks written in Markdown.

5.0
6
marp

softaworks · Fast, text-first internal decks and notes.

3.8

Overall = mean of the per-task overall scores from 2 blind judges.

Every result, side by side

Every skill built the same brief on the same model. Tap any result to open the live page.

Personal portfolio

Winner: frontend-slides

A personal portfolio deck for a product designer, cover, about, 3 to 4 projects with problem, role and impact, skills, and contact. Must feel distinctive, not templated.

9.0Open live ↗
Rank 1 for this taskfrontend-slides

Warm rust/cream editorial palette with strong serif display type, big impact numbers, and confident section dividers; distinctive and cohesive.

Open live demo ↗
8.0Open live ↗
Rank 2 for this taskrevealjs

Rich purple gradient dark theme with 'four projects, each a different kind of hard' concept; polished and thematic, a touch dense.

Open live demo ↗
7.0Open live ↗
Rank 3 for this taskpptx-generator

Soft pink/sage pastel scheme with oversized ghost numerals and playful cards; distinctive mood though slightly uneven spacing.

Open live demo ↗
6.5Open live ↗
pptx

Navy-and-cream deck covers all sections with metric chips, but layout is boxy and fairly conventional with modest hierarchy.

Open live demo ↗
5.0Open live ↗
slidev

Clean minimal white/black report style, thorough problem/role/impact per project, but generic and text-heavy with low visual interest.

Open live demo ↗
4.0Open live ↗
marp

Dense dark deck reading like a doc dump; tiny cramped text, weak hierarchy and spacing, low polish despite covering sections.

Open live demo ↗

Startup pitch deck

Winner: revealjs

A startup fundraising pitch deck for an AI note-taking company, ~10 slides: problem, solution, product, market size, traction, business model, competition, team and the ask.

8.0Open live ↗
Rank 1 for this taskfrontend-slides

Striking amber-on-black minimalist deck with bold terse headlines; distinctive and editorial, though sparse content and low-contrast body text risk under-delivering.

Open live demo ↗
8.0Open live ↗
Rank 2 for this taskrevealjs

Dense dark deck packing every section with metrics, quadrant, and comparison tables; data-rich and polished though visually crowded.

Open live demo ↗
7.5Open live ↗
Rank 3 for this taskpptx

Dark purple deck with confident radial market chart, clean cards, and full section coverage; polished and cohesive if slightly conventional.

Open live demo ↗
7.5Open live ↗
pptx-generator

Navy-and-yellow deck with strong hierarchy, big stat callouts, and complete sections; solid investor feel, a touch busy in places.

Open live demo ↗
4.0Open live ↗
slidev

Airy white deck feels thin and unfinished with awkward whitespace gaps and weak visual weight; covers sections but reads like a rough draft.

Open live demo ↗
3.5Open live ↗
marp

Text-heavy document-style layout with tables and bullet lists; thorough on content but generic, flat, and not investor-grade in presentation.

Open live demo ↗

Product launch

Winner: revealjs

A product launch / company update deck, ~8 slides: a headline metric, three new features, a before/after or roadmap, customer results and a closing CTA.

8.0Open live ↗
Rank 1 for this taskrevealjs

Refined purple dark theme, tidy metric row, icon-tagged features, tasteful spacing and complete sections; most cohesive premium feel.

Open live demo ↗
8.0Open live ↗
Rank 2 for this taskpptx

Polished dark-teal deck with strong metric hero, real charts, donut viz, and full section coverage including roadmap and pricing; cohesive and confident.

Open live demo ↗
7.5Open live ↗
Rank 3 for this taskfrontend-slides

Bold orange-on-black tech aesthetic is distinctive and moody, but dense text blocks and low contrast in places hurt readability and hierarchy.

Open live demo ↗
7.0Open live ↗
pptx-generator

Confident blue/gold/black color-blocking with numbered features and clear before/after; energetic but occasionally chunky and template-flavored.

Open live demo ↗
6.0Open live ↗
slidev

Clean light minimal deck with a colorful gantt roadmap highlight, but very airy/sparse with faint text and low contrast that reads thin.

Open live demo ↗
4.0Open live ↗
marp

Plain white with blue rules and bullet lists; reads like a doc, weak visual hierarchy, minimal graphics, generic and underdesigned.

Open live demo ↗

How we scored slides & pptx

Two independent blind judges scored every output 1 to 10 on each of these axes, then we averaged across judges and tasks. These axes are specific to slides & pptx, while other arenas use their own rubric.

Visual polish
Overall craft and finish, does it look like a designed deck, not a wireframe?
Layout & hierarchy
Spacing, structure and how clearly each slide is organized.
Typography
Type choices, scale, rhythm and readability at slide sizes.
Content completeness
Whether the deck covers every section the brief asked for.
Distinctiveness
How considered and non-templated the deck looks.

Limitations. This arena is a single run on Claude Sonnet 5 with 3 tasks, scored by AI judges rather than crowd votes. Treat the results as directional evidence, not a definitive ranking; re-test on your own workload before committing.

How each skill performed, and who it’s for

frontend-slides

Happycapy

8.2
rank #1

Creates animation-rich HTML presentations from a brief: editorial layouts, strong type and motion.

Visual polish
8.0
Layout & hierarchy
7.3
Typography
7.8
Content completeness
8.2
Distinctiveness
8.7

Best for: Design-forward decks, it won the portfolio deck and the arena overall.

Watch out: Output is an HTML deck, not an editable .pptx.

8.0
rank #2

Standalone reveal.js HTML decks: code-driven slides with custom CSS and full layout control.

Visual polish
8.0
Layout & hierarchy
7.8
Typography
7.7
Content completeness
9.0
Distinctiveness
7.7

Best for: Design-forward browser decks, it won the pitch and launch tasks.

Watch out: HTML, not editable .pptx, and needs a browser to present.

7.3
rank #3

Anthropic's official PowerPoint skill: editable .pptx via pptxgenjs with a template workflow.

Visual polish
7.3
Layout & hierarchy
7.3
Typography
7.2
Content completeness
8.8
Distinctiveness
6.3

Best for: Reliable, editable .pptx across deck types.

Watch out: Solid but less distinctive than the strongest HTML decks here.

pptx-generator

MiniMax

7.2
rank #4

Editable .pptx with PptxGenJS: cover, TOC, content, section and summary slides plus charts.

Visual polish
7.2
Layout & hierarchy
7.3
Typography
6.8
Content completeness
8.7
Distinctiveness
7.5

Best for: Editable PowerPoint with charts and a market-size visual.

Watch out: Very dense slides can get busy.

slidev

antfu

5.0
rank #5

Slidev decks authored in Markdown (Vue-based): developer-friendly slides with themes.

Visual polish
5.0
Layout & hierarchy
5.3
Typography
5.7
Content completeness
7.8
Distinctiveness
4.0

Best for: Developer talks written in Markdown.

Watch out: Default themes render plain, without design direction it looks templated.

3.8
rank #6

Marp Markdown slides: minimal markdown-to-deck with simple themes.

Visual polish
3.7
Layout & hierarchy
4.2
Typography
4.3
Content completeness
7.3
Distinctiveness
2.8

Best for: Fast, text-first internal decks and notes.

Watch out: Markdown-only output skews to text walls, the lowest visual scores here.

The tasks, head-to-head

How each skill scored on the three briefs, and how quality trades off against token cost.

Scores by task
SkillPersonal portfolioStartup pitch deckProduct launchAvg
frontend-slides9.08.07.58.2
revealjs8.08.08.08.0
pptx6.57.58.07.3
pptx-generator7.07.57.07.2
slidev5.04.06.05.0
marp4.03.54.03.8

Cell = the skill’s score on that task (darker = higher). A ring marks the task winner.

Cost vs quality— top-left = cheap and high-scoring
3.06.09.012K32K84KContext tokens per run (log scale, cheaper ←)Quality (overall, better ↑)frontend-slidesrevealjspptxpptx-generatorslidevmarp

Token cost & efficiency

Every skill ran on the same base model, so token use reflects the skill itself: how much it writes (generated) and how large its SKILL.md is (context processed). Summed across the 3 tasks; lower is cheaper.

GeneratedContext (total processed)
marpquality #6
Generated
6K
Context
12K
slidevquality #5
Generated
8K
Context
15K
pptx-generatorquality #4
Generated
24K
Context
30K
pptxquality #3
Generated
23K
Context
39K
revealjsquality #2
Generated
29K
Context
43K
frontend-slidesquality #1
Generated
63K
Context
84K

Context includes the skill’s SKILL.md re-read into the model each turn, so a larger skill file drives up cost, while the no-skill baseline is cheapest.

What we learned

  • frontend-slides won the arena overall (8.17) and the portfolio deck outright, animation-rich HTML with strong editorial type beat every PPTX skill.
  • reveal.js was a close second (8.0) and won the pitch and launch decks, code-driven HTML decks dominated the top of the board.
  • For an editable PowerPoint you’ll keep working in, Anthropic’s pptx and MiniMax’s pptx-generator are the picks (7.3 and 7.2), solid but a notch below the HTML decks on visual polish.
  • Markdown deck skills (Slidev, Marp) scored lowest, they cover the content but default to text-heavy slides with weak hierarchy.
  • Format is the biggest lever: the four code/HTML decks all beat the two Markdown skills, so pick an HTML or PptxGenJS skill when visual quality matters.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best AI skill for making slide decks or presentations?+

In our blind test frontend-slides (zarazhangrui) scored highest overall (8.17/10), producing animation-rich HTML decks, with reveal.js a close second (8.0). For an editable PowerPoint file, Anthropic’s pptx and MiniMax’s pptx-generator are the best options.

Which slide skills produce real editable PowerPoint (.pptx) files?+

Anthropic’s pptx and MiniMax’s pptx-generator both output editable .pptx (built with PptxGenJS). frontend-slides, reveal.js, Slidev and Marp instead produce HTML decks you present in a browser, polished but not native PowerPoint.

What is the best AI skill for a startup pitch deck?+

reveal.js and frontend-slides tied highest on the pitch task (8.0), producing design-forward decks with strong metric callouts; MiniMax’s pptx-generator was close behind and gives you an editable .pptx. Markdown skills (Marp, Slidev) scored lowest, they read like documents rather than investor slides.

Are Markdown slide skills like Marp and Slidev worth using?+

They are fast and cover the content, but in our tests they scored lowest on visual polish and distinctiveness because they default to text-heavy slides. Use them for quick internal decks or developer talks, not design-forward presentations.

How is the Slides Arena scored, and is it fair?+

Every skill builds the same three briefs with the same base model, so results isolate the skill, not the model. PPTX decks are rendered with LibreOffice and HTML decks with a headless browser, then anonymized (A to F) and scored 1 to 10 by two independent blind judges on visual polish, layout, typography, content completeness and distinctiveness.

Where can I find and install these slide skills?+

All are openly available: frontend-slides (zarazhangrui), reveal.js (ryanbbrown), pptx (Anthropic), pptx-generator (MiniMax), slidev (antfu) and marp (softaworks). On Happycapy you can install any of them and run them in your browser with no local setup.

Build with these skills, no setup required

Every skill in this slides & pptx arena installs on Happycapy in one click and runs in your browser on the same model. Start free, or explore 2M+ skills in the Skill Store.